Affiliation:
1. Mathematica Policy Research, 1100 First Street, NE, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20002, USA
Abstract
For comparative effectiveness research to be effective, patients and providers must collaborate in shared decision making (SDM) to make evidence-based clinical decisions that align with patient preferences. We conducted a systematic review to examine patient and provider attitudes toward and engagement in SDM in the USA. Searches in PubMed and PsycINFO identified 1585 articles published between July 2006 and December 2016, of which 290 were screened in for coding and analysis. We found that patients and providers have generally positive attitudes toward SDM, but actual engagement in SDM behavior is lagging. Translation of positive attitudes into behavior could be achieved through policies that support key SDM processes of sharing evidence, considering patient preferences and discussing the relative advantages of different clinical options.
Reference24 articles.
1. From Methods To Policy: Past as prologue: how comparative effectiveness research became patient-centered outcomes research
2. Esposito D, Chen A, Gerteis M, Lake T. Using comparative effectiveness research: information alone won't lead to successful health care reform. Mathematica Policy Research Center on Health Care Effectiveness Issue Brief no. 2 (2010).
3. Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献