Wider implications of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open approach for lung metastasectomy

Author:

Migliore Marcello12,Criscione Alessandra12,Calvo Damiano12,Privitera Giuseppe3,Spatola Corrado3,Parra Ector Soto4,Palmucci Stefano5,Ciancio Nicola6,Cajozzo Massimo7,Maria Giuseppe Di68

Affiliation:

1. Academic Thoracic Surgery Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy

2. Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

3. Radiotherapy Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

4. Oncology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy

5. Radiology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

6. Pneumology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy

7. Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

8. Department of Clinical & Molecular Bio-Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Lung metastasectomy is considered a safe and potentially curative procedure despite there is not a strong evidence that metastasectomy prolongs long-term survival in patients with lung metastases. Moreover, the debate is open regarding the best approach for lung metastasectomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open approach. A systematic review of literature to clarify what is the best approach to prolong survival in patients with lung metastases was performed. Our study confirms that overall survival is equivalent for video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy, therefore the ‘gold standard’ surgical treatment for lung metastases remains a point of debate. The choice of the surgical approach still depends more on the single center or surgeon practice than on strong scientific evidence. A prospective randomized trial could clarify the question.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3