Benefit-risk trade-offs in treatment choice in advanced HER2 negative breast cancer: patient and oncologist perspectives

Author:

Amin Suvina1ORCID,Tolaney Sara M2ORCID,Cambron-Mellott M Janelle3ORCID,Beusterien Kathleen3ORCID,Maculaitis Martine C3ORCID,Mulvihill Emily3,Shinde Reshma4ORCID,McLaurin Kimmie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. AstraZeneca, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA

2. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA

3. Cerner Enviza, 51 Valley Stream Pkwy, Malvern, PA 19355, USA

4. Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate which treatment attributes US patients and oncologists prioritize in HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: Preferences were assessed via a discrete choice experiment. Also, treatment goal statements were rated on an agreement scale. Results: Patients (n = 169) most valued improving overall survival (OS), followed by improving nausea and neuropathy. Oncologists (n = 117) most valued improving OS, followed by neuropathy and progression-free survival. Regarding treatment goals, oncologists (67%) perceived that patients are more focused on efficacy than quality of life; fewer patients (29%) agreed with this statement; 81% of oncologists and 51% of patients agreed that patients prefer oral treatment. Conclusion: Patients and oncologists were willing to accept increases in toxicities in exchange for efficacy improvements in HER2 negative ABC.

Funder

AstraZeneca

Merck Sharp and Dohme

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2020

2. State of art of advanced triple negative breast cancer

3. American Cancer Society. Triple-negative breast cancer (2021). www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/types-of-breast-cancer/triple-negative.html

4. Phase II study of pembrolizumab and capecitabine for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer

5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines with evidence blocks – breast cancer (Version 3) (2019).www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast_blocks.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3