Accuracy of carbon monoxide in venous blood to detect smoking in male and female trauma patients

Author:

Neumann Tim1,Neuner Bruno1,Weiß-Gerlach Edith1,Lippitz Falk1,Spies Claudia D1

Affiliation:

1. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

Background: The determination of the smoking status should be part of the initial assessment in emergency or surgery patients, as preventive measures might reduce long-term morbidity. Next to self-report (not always possible or reliable) the use of biomarkers such as carbon monoxide (CO) has been recommended. Point-of-care CO-hemoglobin (CO-Hb) determination is routinely used in trauma settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the best cut-off of CO-Hb in order to determine the smoking status in minimally injured patients in the emergency department. Methods: After informed consent and ethical committee approval 1283 minimally injured patients were assessed in the emergency department immediately after admission with a computer-based questionnaire including the ‘Heaviness of Smoking Index’ questionnaire. Venous blood sampling and point-of-care oximetry, including CO-Hb, was performed. Results: Median age of all patients (smokers: males: 399, females: 176; nonsmokers: males: 420, females: 288) was 33 years. According to the receiver operating characteristics CO-Hb had an excellent ability to differentiate between smokers and nonsmokers (area under the curve: males: 0.949, females 0.932). Optimal CO-Hb cut-off was 1.8% in males (specificity 95.7%, sensitivity 85.5%) and 1.6% in females (specificity 96.9%, sensitivity 80.1%). Conclusion: CO-Hb was a good marker to detect current smoking in trauma patients. The cut-off of CO-Hb should be lowered to 1.6% in females and 1.8% in males.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,Drug Discovery

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3