Stem cells for cardiac repair: problems and possibilities

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of death throughout the world. In order to limit myocardial damage and possibly generate new myocardium, stem cells are currently being injected into patients with ischemic heart disease. Three major patient investigations, The LateTIME, the TIME and the Swiss Myocardial Infarction trials, have recently addressed the questions of whether progenitor cells from unfractionated bone marrow mononuclear cells limit myocardial damage and what the optimal time to inject these cells after acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) is. In each of these trials, there were no significant differences between treated and control patients when bone marrow cells were administered 5–7 days or 2–3 weeks after AMIs. Nevertheless, these investigations provide important information regarding clinical trial designs. Patients with AMIs in these trials were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention within a median of 4–5 h after the onset of chest pain. Thereafter, all patients received guideline-guided optimal medical therapy. Consequently, the sizes of AMIs were significantly limited. In patients with small AMIs and near-normal left ventricular ejection fractions, progenitor cells are least effective. However, these trials do question whether autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells are the optimal cells for myocardial repair owing to low numbers of progenitor cells in bone marrow aspirates and the significant variability in potency and efficacy of these cells in patients with chronic multisystem diseases. In contrast, the SCIPIO and the CAUDUCEUS trials examined cardiac progenitor cells in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathies. These trials reported over 1–2 years that cardiac progenitor cells produced significant improvements in left ventricular contractility due to 12–24 g decreases in myocardial scars and 18–23 g increases in viable myocardial muscle. However, caution must be exercised in the interpretation of these studies due to the small numbers of highly selected patients and intra- and inter-observer variability in infarct size measurements. Anatomical and histological examinations of large numbers of patients treated with these cells are necessary to confirm significant generation of myocytes and decreases in infarct size and fibrosis.