Affiliation:
1. Department of Acute & Cardiovascular Medicine, Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Pain Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Goteborg, 416 85, Sweden
Abstract
Patients who continue to suffer from severe and disabling angina pectoris, despite optimum treatment in terms of conventional pharmacological therapy and/or revascularization procedures, have been termed as having refractory angina pectoris. The future group of patients with refractory angina pectoris will be different from today’s patients and represent a ‘moving target’ as risk factors, efficacy of treatment and indications continue to change. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is today considered as first-line treatment of refractory angina pectoris, by the European Society of Cardiology, with an anti-ischemic effect. There is strong evidence for SCS giving symptomatic benefits (decrease in anginal attacks), improved quality of life and improvement of functional status. In addition, SCS seems to be cost effective with a ‘break-even’ after approximately 15–16 months.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Molecular Medicine
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Spinal Cord Stimulation;Essentials of Interventional Techniques in Managing Chronic Pain;2024
2. Neuromodulation;Cambridge Handbook of Pain Medicine;2023-12-14
3. Spinal Cord Stimulation;Nerve Blockade and Interventional Therapy;2019
4. Angina in Patients with Evidence of Myocardial Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease;Chronic Coronary Artery Disease;2018
5. Advanced Innovations for Pain;Mayo Clinic Proceedings;2016-02