Magnetic resonance temperature imaging of laser-induced thermotherapy: assessment of fast sequences in ex vivo porcine liver

Author:

Bazrafshan Babak1,Hübner Frank2,Farshid Parviz2,Paul Jijo2,Hammerstingl Renate2,Vogel Vitali3,Mäntele Werner3,Vogl Thomas J2

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. .

2. Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

3. Institute for Biophysics, Department of Physics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Max-von-Laue-Straße 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate magnetic resonance sequences for T1 and proton resonance frequency (PRF) thermometry during laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) in liver tissue. Materials & methods: During LITT (1064 nm; 30 W; 3-cm diffuser; 2–3 min) in ex vivo porcine liver, temperature was measured (25–70°C) utilizing a fiberoptic thermometer and MRI was performed with a 1.5-T scanner through the following sequences: segmented echo planar imaging (seg-EPI) for the PRF method; fast low-angle shot (FLASH), inversion-recovery turbo FLASH (IRTF), saturation-recovery turbo FLASH (SRTF) and true-fast imaging (TRUFI) for the T1 method. Phase angle and signal amplitude (regarding PRF/T1) was recorded in regions of interest, on images under fiberoptic probe tips. Sequences’ thermal coefficients were determined by calibrating phase angle and signal amplitude against temperature and subsequently validated. Results: Coefficients of -0.0089 ± 0.0003 ppm °C-1 (seg-EPI) and -0.917 ± 0.046, -1.166 ± 0.058, -1.038 ± 0.054 and -1.443 ± 0.118°C-1 (FLASH, IRTF, SRTF and TRUFI, respectively) were obtained. Precisions of 0.71, 1.34, 2.07, 2.44 and 3.21°C and, through Bland–Altman analysis, accuracies of -0.67, 0.79, 1.65, 1.57 and 2.13°C (seg-EPI, FLASH, IRTF, SRTF and TRUFI, respectively) were determined. Conclusion: The PRF method with seg-EPI sequence is preferred for thermometry during LITT owing to higher precision and accuracy. Among T1-method sequences, FLASH showed higher accuracy and robustness.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3