Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement

Author:

Burgess Michael1,O’Doherty Kieran2,Secko David3

Affiliation:

1. W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics and Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, 227–6356 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z2, Canada.

2. W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, 227–6356 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z2, Canada.

3. Department of Journalism, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6, Canada.

Abstract

In this article, we examine the role of deliberative democracy theory and practice as a means to enhance policy approaches to ethical and social issues related to biobanks. Biobanks are seen as a vital component in the rapid trend towards personalized medicine, which, while alluring, also face key issues relating to genetic discrimination, privacy, informed consent and a concern regarding how to develop and maintain the trust of citizens. We describe the case of a deliberative public engagement in which a diverse group of citizens deliberated on the appropriate values that should guide biobanking in British Columbia, Canada. We argue that the use of such methods is a necessity if we are to meaningfully consider diverse ‘public interests’ during the development of biobanks and thereby personalized medicine.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Pharmacology,Molecular Medicine,General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. The right prescription for personalized genetic medicine

2. Is the UK public ready for genetic medicine?

3. BurgessMM, Tansey J: Democratic deficit and the politics of “informed and inclusive” consultation. In:Hindsight and Foresight on Emerging Technologies.Einseidel E, Parker R (Eds.). UBC Press, Vancouver, BC (In press).

4. The case for a US prospective cohort study of genes and environment

5. ArbourL, Cook D: DNA on loan: issues to consider when carrying out genetic research with aboriginal families and communities.Commun. Gen.9,153–160 (2006).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3