Utilization of tumor genomics in clinical practice: an international survey among ASCO members

Author:

Barroso-Sousa Romualdo12,Guo Hao3,Srivastava Piyush4,James Ted5,Birch Walter6,Siu Lillian L7,Tew William P8,Tolaney Sara M1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA

2. Current affiliation: Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasilia-DF, 70200-730, Brazil

3. Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA

4. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, USA

5. Division of Surgical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA

6. Division of Practice Management, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA

7. Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada

8. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA

Abstract

Aim: To identify patterns of use and barriers to tumor genomic testing among oncologists. Methods: We surveyed American Society of Clinical Oncology physician members about their use of genomic testing. Results: Among 11,900 members surveyed, a total of 1000 responded to the survey (participation rate, 8.4%). A total of 75% of the respondents included in the analysis reported ordering tests for at least 1–10% of their patients. Practice setting (academic vs community) was only a determinant in the ordering frequency in North America. Regardless of location, academic oncologists were more likely to prescribe medicine in the context of a clinical trial. Access to clinical trials and costs associated with testing were the barriers identified worldwide. Conclusion: There is substantial variation in the use of genomic tools according to region and practice setting; yet, the barriers are similar worldwide.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3