The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Author:

Langkjer Sven Tyge1,Kenholm Julia2,Jensen Jeanette Dupont3,Wedervang Kim4,Brixen Annette Torbøl5,Grunnet Mie6,Stenbygaard Lars7,Gilje Bjørnar8,Danø Hella9,Glavicic Vesna10,Jacobsen Erik Hugger11,Brems-Eskildsen Anne Sofie1,Kruse Helle Lemvig1,Dongsgaard Trine2,Neimann Jeppe1,Geisler Jürgen1213ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus C, Denmark

2. Department of Oncology, Regionshospitalet Herning, 7400 Herning, Denmark

3. Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark

4. Department of Oncology, Sønderborg Sygehus, 6400 Sønderborg, Denmark

5. Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark

6. Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

7. Department of Oncology, Aalborg Sygehus Syd, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark

8. Department of Hematology & Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway

9. Department of Oncology, Hilleroed Hospital, 3400 Hilleroed, Denmark

10. Department of Oncology, Naestved, 4700 Naestved, Denmark

11. Department of Oncology, Sydvestjysk Sygehus Esbjerg, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark

12. Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway

13. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3