Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs on cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality in atrial fibrillation

Author:

Lakdawalla Darius1,Turakhia Mintu P2,Jhaveri Mehul3,Mozaffari Essy3,Davis Pamela4,Bradley Lily5,Solomon Matthew D2

Affiliation:

1. Leonard D Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, 650 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-90626, USA.

2. Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2146, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

3. Evidence-Based Medicine, Sanofi-Aventis US, Mail Stop 55C-225A, 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA

4. Primary Care & Established Medicines, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA

5. Comparative Effectiveness Research Practice, Precision Health Economics, 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 500, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA

Abstract

Aim: To assess, through a systematic review, evidence for the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) on cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization and mortality. Materials & methods: English language articles were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry and were screened for study applicability and methodological quality. Results: Out of 3526 identified studies, 38 were selected for analysis (19 evaluated individual AADs, 13 compared rate- versus rhythm-control strategies, and 6 evaluated multiple AADs but did not report outcomes for individual agents). None of the studies examining individual AADs employed the CV hospitalization end point used in ATHENA (the reference trial). There were no head-to-head comparisons of individual AADs on CV hospitalization. Most high-quality studies used multidrug rate- versus rhythm-control strategies. Conclusion: Assessment of the comparative effectiveness of individual AADs on CV hospitalization and mortality end points is not possible with the current evidence.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3