HIV, breast cancer and vaccines: what do high-profile cases reveal about stakeholder engagement in research?

Author:

Morain Stephanie R1,Concannon Thomas W234,Wittenberg Eve5

Affiliation:

1. Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 310D, Houston, TX 77030, USA

2. The RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 20, Boston, MA 02116, USA

3. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

4. Tufts Clinical & Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA

5. Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Abstract

Substantially engaging stakeholders in research involves making extensive changes to the full life cycle of research, from the initial stage of selecting research priorities to the final stages of dissemination and implementation. Recent scholarship has explored logistical and methodological challenges, including the time, training and resources required for engagement. However, inadequate attention has been given to the intended ends or goals of engagement – what do we want engagement to achieve? An examination of historical case studies can yield important insights regarding engagement and its intended ends. Using historical perspective methods, we explore how clarity about the ends of engagement can inform the design of engagement efforts and lead to better outcomes. We present several lessons for improving stakeholder-engaged research.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A protocol for stakeholder engagement in head and neck cancer pragmatic trials;BMC Cancer;2024-09-05

2. A proposed framework for patient engagement throughout the broader research enterprise;Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research;2020-04

3. Engaging Community Members to Eradicate Health Disparities;American Journal of Public Health;2020-02

4. References;Ethical Considerations When Preparing a Clinical Research Protocol;2020

5. Special issues raised by evolving areas of clinical research;Ethical Considerations When Preparing a Clinical Research Protocol;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3