Capacity building for assessing new technologies: approaches to examining personalized medicine in practice

Author:

Van Bebber Stephanie L,Trosman Julia R1,Liang Su-Ying2,Wang Grace2,Marshall Deborah A23,Knight Sara245,Phillips Kathryn A2

Affiliation:

1. Center for Business Models in Healthcare, 2705 Agatite Avenue, Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60625, USA

2. UCSF Center for Translational & Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California Street Suite 420, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA

3. University of Calgary, Room 3C56, Health Research Innovation Center, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, USA

4. Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Program to Improve Health Care for Veterans with Complex Comorbid Conditions, San Francisco, CA, USA

5. University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco VA Medical Center (151R), 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA

Abstract

This article focuses on the overarching question: how can we use existing data to develop the capacity to improve the evidence base on personalized medicine technologies and particularly regarding their utilization and clinical utility? We focus on data from health payers who are key stakeholders in capacity building, as they need data to guide decisions and they develop data as part of operations. Broadly defined, health payers include insurance carriers, third party payers, health-plan sponsors and organized delivery systems. Data from health payers have not yet been widely used to assess personalized medicine. Now, with an increasing number of personalized technologies covered and reimbursed by health payers, and an increasing number of emerging technologies that will require policy decisions, there is a great opportunity to develop the evidence base using payer data and by engaging with these stakeholders. Here, we describe data that are available from, and are being developed by, health payers and assess how these data can be further developed to increase the capacity for future research, using three examples. The examples suggest that payer data can be used to examine clinical utility and approaches can be developed that simultaneously address the characteristics of personalized medicine, real world data and organizations. These examples can now help us to elucidate how to best examine clinical utility in actual practice and build evaluation approaches that can be applied to future technologies.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Pharmacology,Molecular Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3