Combination therapy with simultaneous delivery of spinal cord stimulation modalities: COMBO randomized controlled trial

Author:

Wallace Mark S1,North James M2,Phillips Gregory M3,Calodney Aaron K4,Scowcroft James A5,Popat-Lewis Bindu U6,Lee Jennifer M7,Washabaugh Edward P8,Paez Julio9,Bolash Robert B10,Noles John11,Atallah Joseph12,Shah Binit13,Ahadian Farshad M1,Trainor Drew M14,Chen Lilly15,Jain Roshini15

Affiliation:

1. University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA

2. Carolinas Pain Institute & the Center for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA

3. Pacific Sports & Spine, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA

4. Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX, 75701, USA

5. Pain Management Associates, Lee’s Summit, MO, 64086, USA

6. Michigan Pain Consultants, Big Rapids, MI, 49307, USA

7. Evergreen Health Medical Group, Kirkland, WA, 98034, USA

8. Michigan Pain Specialists, Ypsilanti, MI, 48198, USA

9. South Lake Pain Institute, Clermont, FL, 34711, USA

10. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA

11. Spine & Pain Specialists, Shreveport, LA, 71105, USA

12. The Toledo Clinic, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA

13. Carolinas Pain Center, Huntersville, NC, 28078, USA

14. The Denver Spine & Pain Institute, Denver, CO, 80033, USA

15. Boston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, CA, 91355, USA

Abstract

Aim: The Combining Mechanisms for Better Outcomes randomized controlled trial assessed the effectiveness of various spinal cord stimulation (SCS) modalities for chronic pain. Specifically, combination therapy (simultaneous use of customized sub-perception field and paresthesia-based SCS) versus monotherapy (paresthesia-based SCS) was evaluated. Methods: Participants were prospectively enrolled (key inclusion criterion: chronic pain for ≥6 months). Primary end point was the proportion with ≥50% pain reduction without increased opioids at the 3 month follow-up. Patients were followed for 2 years. Results: The primary end point was met (n = 89; p < 0.0001) in 88% of patients in the combination-therapy arm (n = 36/41) and 71% in the monotherapy arm (n = 34/48). Responder rates at 1 and 2 years (with available SCS modalities) were 84% and 85%, respectively. Sustained functional outcomes improvement was observed out to 2 years. Conclusion: SCS-based combination therapy can improve outcomes in patients with chronic pain. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03689920 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ), Combining Mechanisms for Better Outcomes (COMBO)

Funder

Boston Scientific Corporation

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Reference60 articles.

1. Combination pharmacotherapy for management of chronic pain: from bench to bedside

2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Alliance to Advance Comprehensive Integrative Pain Management. Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force Report (2019). https://painmanagementalliance.org/resources/hhs-report-2019/

3. Opioid Prescription Drug Abuse and Its Relation to Heroin Trends

4.

The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3