Racial and ethnic representation in epigenomic studies of preterm birth: a systematic review

Author:

Collier Ai-ris Y12ORCID,Ledyard Rachel3,Montoya-Williams Diana34,Qiu Maylene5,Dereix Alexandra E36,Farrokhi Minou Raschid17,Hacker Michele R128,Burris Heather H34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA

2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA

3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

5. Biomedical Library, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

6. Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL 60153, USA

7. Colby College, Waterville, ME 04901, USA

8. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Abstract

Aim: We conducted a systematic review evaluating race/ethnicity representation in DNA methylomic studies of preterm birth. Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL, Scopus and relevant citations from 1 January 2000 to 30 June 2019. Study appraisal & synthesis methods: Two authors independently identified abstracts comparing DNA methylomic differences between term and preterm births that included race/ethnicity data. Results: 16 studies were included. Black and non-Hispanic Black deliveries were well represented (28%). However, large studies originating from more than 95% White populations were excluded due to unreported race/ethnicity data. Most studies were cross-sectional, allowing for reverse causation. Most studies were also racially/ethnically homogeneous, preventing direct comparison of DNA methylomic differences across race/ethnicities. Conclusion: In DNA methylomic studies, Black women and infants were well represented. However, the literature has limitations and precludes drawing definitive conclusions.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Cancer Research,Genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3