Affiliation:
1. University of Oulu, Finnland
Abstract
Lasting relationships with partners from the field have long been unacknowledged in anthropology. While ethnographers routinely reflect on their positionality and local entanglements during fieldwork, little is exposed of their private and intimate lives, behind closed doors. Instead of asking epistemological questions related to the research setting, this chapter - written in the form of a letter to our shared supervisor Martin Sökefeld - seeks to make sense of the reasons for anthropology students' long-term commitment to a partner met while conducting ethnographic fieldwork. Moreover, we discuss the discipline's reluctance to embrace intimate relationships with partners from the field despite its conceptual aspiration to deconstruct structural inequalities and biases. Lastly, we follow the intricacies of these transnational marriages that, while carrying worldly biases, also push against the (post)-colonial stereotypes and power dynamics anthropology has long aspired to deconstruct.
Reference24 articles.
1. Ariëns, Ilva/Strijp, Ruud (1989): “Anthropological Couples: In the Field and Beyond.” In: Focaal 10, pp. 5–24.
2. Behar, Ruth (2022 [1997]): The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart, New York: Beacon Press.
3. Braukmann, Fabienne/Haug, Michaela/Metzmacher, Katja/Stolz, Rosalie (eds.) (2020): Being a Parent in the Field: Implications and Challenges of Accompanied Fieldwork, Bielefeld: transcript.
4. Carsten, Janet (2012): “Fieldwork Since the 1980s: Total Immersion and its Discontents.” In: Richard Fardon/Oliva Harris/Trevor Hugh/James Marchand/Cris Shore/Veronica Strang/Richard Wilson/Mark Nuttall (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology, London: Sage Publications, pp. 7–20.
5. Coffey, Amanda (2018): “Sex in the Field: Intimacy and Intimidation.” In: Trevor Welland/Lesley Pugsley, Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research, London: Routledge Revivals, pp. 57–74