Agrarian Neoliberalism, Authoritarianism, and the Political Reactions from below in Southern Africa

Author:

Monjane BoaventuraORCID

Abstract

Southern Africa has a very peculiar past. It is a region where settler colonialism used land and agriculture as instruments of domination and oppression. The legacy of this past is visible. Agrarian capital is instrumentalizing this past and advancing agrarian neoliberalism through international financial institutions and other actors. But this is not happening without resistance. Agrarian movements are among those that play an important role in resisting what I call agrarianauthoritarianism,whilepointingthewaytoemancipatorycounter- responses.Advancing with unprecedented alacrity throughout Southern Africa, agrarian authoritarianism is combined with the process of financialization of the land and agricultural sector and instrumentalization of state institutions and policies to foster frameworks that benefit capital while expropriating, expelling, and exploiting peasants and other small-scale food producers. This is the new phase of agrarian capitalism, manifesting itself with varying degrees of authoritarianism, especially through the imposition of neoliberal policies. Looking at Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe, this chapter discusses the manifestation of agrarian authoritarianism in SouthernAfricaandexploresthewaysinwhichthreeagrarianmovementsinthosecountries , namely the National Union of Peasants in Mozambique (UNAC), the Zimbabwe Smallholder Organic Farmers' Forum (ZIMSOFF), and South Africa's Right to Agrarian Reform for Food Sovereignty Campaign (FSC) forge emancipatory initiatives to counter the authoritarian wave and challenge agrarian authoritarianism in the region.

Publisher

transcript Verlag

Reference56 articles.

1. Alonso-Fradejas, A. (2021), “The Rise of Authoritarian Corporate Populism”, Latin American Perspectives, 17 May, available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0094582X211004912. Last accessed on 24 June 2022.

2. Andrade, D. (2020), “Populism from above and below: the path to regression in Brazil”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1–27.

3. Anseeuw, W., and N. Mathebula (2008), Evaluating land reform’s contribution to South Africa’s pro-poor growth pattern, Pretoria: Cirad, available at https://agritrop.cirad.fr/547917/1/document_547917.pdf. Last accessed on 6 June 2022.

4. Babones, S. (2018), The New Authoritarianism: Trump, Populism, and the Tyranny of Experts, Medford, MA; Cambridge: Polity Press.

5. Barroso, E., R. Castel-Branco, and B. Monjane (2020), “Fast-tracking Financialization: International Financial Institutions' Responses to the Covid‑19 Pandemic in Mozambique”, Policy Document, Maputo and Johannesburg: Alternactiva and WoMin, available at https://rightsindevelopment.uwazi.io/api/files/1642438947267zlzycd2ooq.pdf. Last accessed on 25 February 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3