Ethical research principles: Documenting Latin American faculty perspectives through Q-sort

Author:

LARROTTA Clarena1ORCID,MENESES Elizabeth2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Texas State University

2. Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios, Seccional Antioquia-Chocó

Abstract

The ethical principles in research are universal and serve as a humanizing guide throughout the research process. Their application requires keeping in mind the local health, socio-cultural, and economic conditions where research is conducted. Higher education institutions and researchers share the responsibility of ensuring application of ethical research principles in science, technology, and innovation activities. This article reports findings from a mixed methods study on the perspectives of university faculty regarding the application of research ethical principles to research endeavors. Utilizing a Q-method approach to capturing subjectivity, 52 faculty-researchers participated in an online Q-sort exercise which also included an open-ended questionnaire. The study looked at similarities and differences in viewpoints regarding the application of ethical research principles. The study research questions included: (1) what are the participants’ perspectives applying research ethical principles? (2) what are the similarities and differences in viewpoints when looking at the participants’ years of research experience, research ethics preparation, and field of expertise? This article presents the results analyzing the responses of the participating faculty researchers. Similarities and differences of their perspectives were documented by looking at years of research experience, research ethics background, and field of expertise. Study findings point to the need to offer more opportunities for training to better prepare experienced and less experienced researchers on how to anticipate and plan for ethical dilemmas that may arise while conducting research. Emerging and experienced researchers can benefit from such training and self-awareness. Keywords: Q-sort, Ethical Research, Ethical Dilemmas, Scientific Research, Faculty Perspectives.

Funder

NA

Publisher

Durmus Burak

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science

Reference20 articles.

1. Brown, S. R. (1996). Q-methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research. 6, 561-567.

2. Christians, C. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. Qualitative Research (2nd ed.) pp. 133-155.

3. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica. (2019). Código Nacional de la Integridad Científica . Lima: Concytec.

4. Creswell, J. W. (2016). 30 Essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage.

5. Cross, R.M. (2005). Exploring attitudes: The case for Q-methodology. Health Education Research. 20(2), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg121

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3