REHABILITATION EFFECT OF CORRECTION OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

Author:

Asratov A. T.1,Vinogradov I. V.2,Gvasaliya B. R.3,Kachmazov A. A.4,Kochetov A. G.3,Samsonov Yu. V.1,Sitnikov N. V.3,Tolkachev A. O.1,Kostin A. A.1

Affiliation:

1. P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

2. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

3. A.A. Vishnevsky 3 Central Military Clinical Hospital Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

4. N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the effect of the development of erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RPE) on the assessment of these patients’ quality of life and their psychological state and the influence on these parameters of ED treatment by implantation of the prosthesis of the penis.Materials and methods. The material of the study was analysis of the questionnaire data of 30 patients with PC with the postoperative ED before the postoperative period and after the falloprosthesis. In the long-term postoperative period (2–3 years) patients (= 30) with an ED stand, who wanted to restore sexual function, were installed a 3-component prosthesis of the penis. The comparison group consisted of 38 patients, examined 3 years after RPE. The second comparison group consisted of 28 patients who were examined prior to surgical treatment. The questioning of patients was carried out using the questionnaire MIEF-5, which characterizes the state of sexual function, and the psychological test of Spielberger-Khanin for assessing anxiety.Results. Itwasshownthatthesumofthepointsofsituationalanxietyafterprostheticsofthepenisdecreasedfrom 32.4 ± 3.6 to 17.4 ± 1.5 points (= 3.74-5), and personal anxiety – from 43.7 ± 2.2 to 33.0 ± 1.2 points (= 1.71-5); and, these differences are statistically highly reliable. Accordingly, the evaluation of sexual function shifted in a positive direction (all patients confirmed satisfaction with the restored sexual function).Сonclusion. The results attest to the high rehabilitation efficiency of correction of ED, which developed after RP, by installing a falloprosthesis.

Publisher

QUASAR, LLC

Subject

Microbiology (medical),Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Reference23 articles.

1. Wong YN, Mitra N, Hudes G, Localio R, Schwartz JS, Wan F, et al. Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men. JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2683-93. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2683

2. Abdollah F, Sun M, Schmitges J, Tian Z, Jeldres C, Briganti A, et al. Cancer-specific and other-cause mortality after radical prostatectomy versus observation in patients with prostate cancer: competing-risks analysis of a large North American population-based cohort. Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):920-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.039.

3. Tewari A, Divine G, Chang P, Shemtov MM, Milowsky M, Nanus D, Menon M. Long-term survival in men with high grade prostate cancer: a comparison between conservative treatment, radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy – a propensity scoring approach. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):911-5. DOI: 10.1016/ j.juro.2006.10.040

4. Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9:CD009625. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.

5. Ong WL, Evans SM, Spelman T, Kearns PA, Murphy DG, Millar JL. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer – findings from the population-based victorian prostate cancer registry. BJU Int. 2016 Oct;118(4):563-9. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13380

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3