Author:
Wardani Dewi Kusuma,Effendy Ruslan,Saraswati Widya
Abstract
Backround: Smear layer formed during cavity preparation interfere with the adhesion between restoration and tooth structure and is considered a barrier that would degrade the quality of adhesion. Smear layer does not have a stable substrate for adhesion, gradually layer dissolves in the restorative material and cause microleakage, penetration of bacteria and inflammation of the pulp. Adhesion to dentin is more difficult to achieve than enamel, therefore the cleaning procedure on dentin require special treatment. Conditioner form a weak acid is used to remove the smear layer and surface contamination on the email or dentin which can reduce the adhesion of the material and the tooth surface. Dentin conditioner is an acid material containing 10% polyacrylic acid conditioner while Cavity conditioner an acid material containing 20% polyacrylic acid and 3% aluminum chloride. The higher the concentration, the more smear layer is dissolved in order to obtain adhesion of glass ionomer cements better because it is not blocked by the smear layer. Purpose: The purpose of this laboratory research is to study the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement in dentin after application dentin conditioner and cavity conditioner .Material and Method: Twenty seven bovine cow's teeth were divided into three groups. Each group consisted of nine samples. Group 1 was control (without conditioner). Group 2 was treated with the Dentin conditioner. Group 3 was treated with the Cavity conditioner. Result: The average shear bond strength in group 1 is 3.31 Mpa, group 2 is 7.74 MPa and group 3 is 9.92 Mpa. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between third group and the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement on dentin with application of the Cavity conditioner is higher than with application of the Dentin conditioner and without application conditioner
Reference13 articles.
1. C.Poggio. 2014. Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements; Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Science, University of Pavia, Italy; V (1): 15-222
2. O'Brien WJ; 2008; Dental Materials and their Selection;Canada;Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. 4th Ed.
3. Bonifacio CC, Werner A and Kleverlaan CJ. 2012. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. Acta Odontol Scand. Dec;70(6):471-7.
4. Muharri, A., Suprastiwi, E. and Djauharie, N. 2011. The Influence of Surface Roughness and Conditioner on The Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement to Dentin. Malaysian Dental Journal, 33(2), pp.42-48.
5. Meerbeek, B., Munck, J and Yoshida, Y. 2003, Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges, Journal of operative dentistry 28:(3):215-235