The Difference of Irrigant Solution between Red Pine Extract (Pinus densiflora) and Green Pine Extract (Pinus merkusii) Against Cleanliness of Root Canal Walls

Author:

Wahjuningrum Dian Agustin,Setyabudi Setyabudi,Sukaton Sukaton,Krishartini Yuline

Abstract

Background: Smear layer is an accumulation of organic material, debris, and inorganic material in root canal wall. Irrigant solution must be able to eliminate organic and inorganic materials. Herbal extract such as pine contain saponins that can dissolve organic and inorganic materials. Korea is a country that has used pine in this case red pine as an antibacterial medicament. In Indonesia, there are also green pine species. Purpose: To explain the differences in cleanliness of the root canals after irrigation using extracts of red pine (Pinus densiflora) and green pine (Pinus merkusii). Methods: This study used twenty-seven mandibular premolar teeth which were divided into 3 groups each group consisted of 9 premolar teeth. All samples were prepared using ProTaper for Hand Use and irrigated. Group I was irrigated using 2.5% NaOCl, group II was irrigated with red pine extract, and group III was irrigated using green pine extract. Tooth that has been prepared, were cut vertically into 2 and cut horizontally in 1/3 apical section. The root canal surface was observed using a scanning electron microscope. Photomicrograph was observed by three observers using a score and performed an analysis test. Results: There were no difference between red pine (Pinus densiflora) and green pine (Pinus merkusii) in root canal cleanliness with a significance value of 0.169 (p> 0.05) Conclusion: Red pine extract had the same smear layer cleaning power as green pine extract.

Publisher

Universitas Airlangga

Subject

Microbiology

Reference14 articles.

1. Krishna, S., Shankar, S., Kumari, V., Pradeep, R., Rajesh, P. and Kasthi, K. Comparative Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of Removal of Intracanal Smear Layer Using Different Concentration of Three Root Canal Irrigants: An In vitro Study. Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research. 2016: 3(1), pp.15-20.

2. Torabinejad, M. and Walton, R. Endodontics Principles and Practice. 4th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. 2009

3. Hargreaves, K., Berman, L. and Rotstein, I. Cohen's pathways of the pulp. 11th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. 2016

4. Garg, N. and Garg, A. Textbook of endodontics. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2014

5. Topbas, C. and Adiguzel, O. Endodontic Irrigation Solutions: A Review. International Dental Research. 2017: 7(3), p.54.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3