Author:
Akbar Andi Ali Said,Pratiwi Oktafiani C.,Nurprojo Indaru S.,Firdaus Syah
Abstract
Rural areas, according to Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, are placed as the economic power behind the villages themselves, especially concerning the agricultural sector. Ideally, the village focused on the development of the agricultural sector. However, there are 158 factories in Purbalingga Regency located in rural areas. While the protection of the rural areas and the spatial planning of industry is unclear, there are conflicts primarily related to the designation of rivers, irrigation canals, agricultural features, settlements, and water and air pollution. This research explains the study of industrial space and the related functional arrangements, especially in the agriculture-based rural and industrial areas of Purbalingga. This paper based on the research results, which were determined using qualitative methods and a case study approach. The data collected through observations, a document-based study, and interviews. The informant selection techniques used were purposive and snowball. Data validity was confirmed using an interactive analysis model. This study interviewed eleven informants who were from the Agricultural Office in addition to the Chief of the Urban Village, a Former Chief of the Village, a Former Chief of the Urban Village, a Chief from Village, Village Officers, Public Society Institution activists, and affected farmers. The results of the study are as follows 1) Purbalingga Government has an unclear vision concerning its long-term planning for industrial areas. The lack can see it of harmony present in the development of rural and industrial areas causing conflict between the actors involved, 2) the high investment from Purbalingga Government brings in a new problem, which is the neglecting of both the agricultural and environmental interests present. This research concludes, the government allowed for the development of rural areas that otherwise prioritized the development of the industrial sector. It is done without considering spatial planning, causing a sustained conflict between the actors.
Reference29 articles.
1. Arifin B (2005) Pembangunan Pertanian: Paradigma Kebijakan dan Strategi Revitalisasi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
2. Badan Pusat Statistik (2017) Kabupaten Purbalingga dalam Angka 2017. [Accessed 3 September 2018]. https://purbalinggakab.bps.go.id/publication/2017/08/11/f7db8533fdefcce2cb855150/kabu paten-purbalingga-dalam-angka-2017.html.
3. Barus BP, Putra DO, Rusdiana AS, & Hadi S (2010) Pengembangan Kawasan Perdesaan dalam RTRW berbasis Karakter lokal dan Lingkungannya (Pusat Pengkajian Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah). Bogor: LPPM IPB.
4. Bennett JW (1976) The Ecological Transition: Cultural Anthropology and Human Action. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
5. Chambers R (1988) Pembangunan Desa: Mulai dari Belakang. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献