Affiliation:
1. Institute of Oriental Studies, NAS RA
Abstract
Any discussion of the ethnic and political history of eastern Asia Minor, particularly
the Upper Euphrates area after the disintegration of the Hittite Empire should be studied
in close relationship with the Mushki problem. Here this ethnic element was
considerably active on both sides of the Euphrates during the XII-VIII centuries BC,
which is well traced even in Northern Mesopotamia. In the article is discussed the
problem of these tribes, their possible impact on the political and cultural history of Asia
Minor and the Armenian Highland. These key problems are of utmost importance for the
reconstruction of the history of the region. The Mushki had played the same role here
as, for example, the so-called "Dorians" in Homeric and Classical Greece, Aramaeans
in Neo-Assyrian Empire, etc., which until now remains fairly underestimated. The wide
geographical area where in different sources appears the term Mushki (also in Western
Asia Minor and in the Balkans) indicates that we deal with different ethnic groups,
though probably related to each other culturally and maybe linguistically.
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia
Reference87 articles.
1. Albright W.F. 1975. Syria, the Philistines, and Phoenicia. in CAH II/2, 507-536.
2. Bagg A.M. 2017. Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der neuassyrischen Zeit Teil 2:
3. Zentralassyrien und benachbarte Gebiete, Ägypten und die arabische Halbinsel.
4. Wiesbaden (Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cuneiformes, Bd. 7/2-2).
5. Barnett R.D. 1975a. The Sea Peoples, in CAH II/2, 359-378.