Affiliation:
1. National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia International Scientific-Educational Center Head of the Chair of Foreign Languages
Abstract
Historically, there have been two approaches to interjections. First, as spontaneous verbal expressions that denoted emotional or mental states, later they were seen within the framework of verbal description. And indeed, interjections have natural expressive and symbolic-relative and communicative contents, which theoretically need to be reconciled to replace the contradiction between the mentioned approaches with a transition. For this purpose, it is necessary to examine emotional-attitudinal expressions (hereinafter EAEs) not only from the point of view of a single language but also from the point of view of cross-linguistic and intercultural comparison.
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia
Reference10 articles.
1. Ameka F., Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech, Journal of pragmatics 18, 1992, pp.101-118.
2. ierzbicka A. The semantics of Interjection. Journal of Pragmatics 18/2; 1992, pp.159-192.
3. Goffman E., Forms of Talk, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981, pp.124-157.
4. Sapir Ed., Language, An Introduction to the study of Speech, Cambridge University Press 2014, pp 3-5.
5. Crystal D., Phonaesthetically speaking. English Today 42, 1995, pp. 8-12.