The role of school socioeconomic status in school-wide technology integration in the U.S.

Author:

Cheng Shonn1ORCID,Parker Mary2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate Institute of Technological & Vocational Education, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei City, TAIWAN

2. Department of Library Science and Technology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relations between first-order and second-order barriers and ICT (information and communications technology) integration across schools with different SES (socioeconomic status) levels in the US. This study was based on a nationally representative sample of public elementary and secondary schools included in the fast response survey system (FRSS)–educational technology in the US public schools. Multiple-group path modeling was employed as the main analytic method. The results showed that in advantaged schools, first-order and second-order barriers demonstrated additive effects on ICT integration. However, in disadvantaged schools, first-order and second-order barriers showed multiplicative effects on ICT integration. This study suggests that in advantaged schools, eradicating second-order barriers can compensate for the constraints on ICT integration imposed by first-order barriers. However, in disadvantaged schools, removing second-order barriers will not be effective if first-order barriers are not addressed first. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the role of school SES in planning school-wide ICT integration. Also, a contextualized model is proposed to capture the differential relations between barriers and ICT integration in specific school contexts.

Publisher

Bastas Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Education

Reference52 articles.

1. Alghasab, M. B., Alfadley, A., & Aladwani, A. M. (2020). Factors affecting technology integration in EFL classrooms: The case of Kuwaiti government primary schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(4), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n4p10

2. Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning Inc.

3. Baker, R. S., & Gowda, S. M. (2018). The 2018 technology & learning insights report: Towards understanding App effectiveness and cost. https://www.brightbytes.net/resources-archive/insightsreport2018

4. Bearden, S. (2017). Building technology infrastructure for learning. US Department of Education. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/07/2017-Infrastructure-Guide.pdf

5. Bowman, M. A., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Jiang, Z., & Xie, K. (2020). Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1830895

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Teaching with technology requires high expectancies and high values;Education and Information Technologies;2024-05-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3