Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Science Education, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, SPAIN
Abstract
Currently mathematics difficulties in schools are a major problem due to several factors. Some research suggest that mathematics teaching-learning methodology could be one of the causes. As a result, alternative teaching methods to the traditional approach (ciphers-based closed algorithm [CBC]) have emerged, such as numbers-based open algorithm (ABN) method. Some research about this new approach has emerged, including neuropsychological studies. The current study aims to analyze performance and potential cognitive differences in solving a computerized task linked to eye-tracking device, comparing CBC and ABN approaches. 18 5th & 6th graders participants were evaluated through a computerized mental arithmetic task. Nine participants learned mathematics with CBC, and nine with ABN approach. Participants were distributed according to his/her mathematical performance rate in three sub-groups, three students per sub-group: low, medium, and high. The ABN method group obtained a higher overall score in the computerized task (mean [M]<sub>CBC</sub>=16.22; M<sub>ABN</sub>=17.11), but the differences were not statistically significant (p=.690). However, significant differences have been found in two eye-tracking measures. ABN method group obtained a lower number of fixations average in areas of interest [AOIs]) (M<sub>CBC</sub>=5.01; M<sub>ABN</sub>=3.85; p=.001), and a lower pupil diameter average in AOIs (M<sub>CBC</sub>=4.07; M<sub>ABN</sub>=3.91; p=.001). This occurred regardless of the participants’ mathematical performance. These results suggest that differences between groups were not in task performance, but in cognitive effort spent in solving the task.
Reference56 articles.
1. Aguilar, M., Aragón, E., & Navarro, J. I. (2015). Las dificultades de aprendizaje de las matemáticas (DAM). Estado del arte [Mathematics learning difficulties (DAM). State of the art]. Revista de Psicología y Educación [Journal of Psychology and Education], 10(2), 13-42. https://www.revistadepsicologiayeducacion.es/pdf/125.pdf
2. Al-Azawai, M. (2019). The application of eye-tracking in consumer behavior. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(12), 83-86. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Al-Azawi/publication/333677546_The_Application_of_Eye-Tracking_in_Consumer_Behaviour/links/5e47c193458515072d9e2384/The-Application-of-Eye-Tracking-in-Consumer-Behaviour.pdf
3. Alemdag, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2018). A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 125, 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.023
4. Aragón, E., Delgado, C., & Marchena, E. (2017). Diferencias de aprendizaje matemático entre los métodos de enseñanza ABN y CBC [Mathematics learning differences between ABN and CBC teaching methods]. Psychology, Society & Education, 9(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v9i1.462
5. Araya-Pizarro, S. C., & Espinoza Pastén, L. (2020). Aportes desde las neurociencias para la comprensión de los procesos de aprendizaje en los contextos educativos [Contributions from the neurosciences for the understanding of learning processes in educational contexts]. Propósitos y Representaciones [Purposes and Representations], 8(1), e312. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n1.312