Affiliation:
1. Economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR)
2. Co-founder and Senior Economist at CEPR
Abstract
A large and growing percentage of households are missed in the monthly Current Population Survey (CPS). For the survey as a whole, the rate of nonresponse is roughly 13 percent. This is higher for Blacks, with the share for young Black men being about 30 percent. The BLS’s current methodology effectively assumes that, with adjustment for various characteristics, people who are not included in a follow-up survey may not differ systematically from those who are included. The present paper, however, provides evidence that this may not be the case. With the rotation panel structure of the CPS data from 2003 to 2019, we investigate bias from nonresponse in CPS and its association with one’s prior labor market status, paying particular attention to how the relationship differs by race, ethnicity, and gender. Our analysis suggests that people are considerably more likely to be missing in a subsequent observation if they are unemployed or not in the labor force in the prior observation. We also estimate what the real labor market outcomes might have been when adjusting for nonresponse and undercoverage. Findings indicate that the current methodology may underestimate the national unemployment and labor force participation rates by about 0.7 and 1.2 percentage points, respectively. The gap between observed and adjusted unemployment rates tends to grow beginning in 2015. The unemployment rate is more understated for Blacks than for whites, particularly with a gap of about 3.3 percentage points for young Black men (age 16 to 34).
Funder
Institute for New Economic Thinking
Publisher
Institute for New Economic Thinking
Reference12 articles.
1. Ahn, Hie Joo, and James D. Hamilton. Measuring labor-force participation and the incidence and duration of unemployment. No. w27394. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020.
2. Bailar, Barbara A. “The effects of rotation group bias on estimates from panel surveys.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 70, no. 349 (1975): 23-30.
3. Dziura, James D., Lori A. Post, Qing Zhao, Zhixuan Fu, and Peter Peduzzi. "Strategies for dealing with missing data in clinical trials: from design to analysis." The Yale journal of biology and medicine 86, no. 3 (2013): 343. PMID: 24058309; PMCID: PMC3767219.
4. Krueger, Alan B., Alexandre Mas, and Xiaotong Niu. "The evolution of rotation group bias: Will the real unemployment rate please stand up?" Review of Economics and Statistics 99, no. 2 (2017): 258-264. http://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00630
5. Meyer, Bruce D., Wallace KC Mok, and James X. Sullivan. "Household surveys in crisis." Journal of Economic Perspectives 29, no. 4 (2015): 199-226. http://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.4.199
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献