Shadow Lobbyists

Author:

d’Este Rocco1,Draca Mirko2,Fons-Rosen Christian3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Economics, University of Sussex

2. Department of Economics & CAGE Research Centre, University of Warwick

3. Department of Economics, University of California, Merced

Abstract

Special interest influence via lobbying is increasingly controversial and legislative efforts to deal with this issue have centered on the principle of transparency. In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of the current regulatory framework provided by the US Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA). Specifically, we study the role of ex-Congressional officials who join US lobbying firms in positions that could be related to lobbying activity but without officially registering as lobbyists themselves. We find that firm lobbying revenues increase significantly when these potential ‘shadow lobbyists’ join, with effects in the range of 10-20%. This shadow lobbyist revenue effect is comparable to the effect of a registered lobbyist at the median of the industry skill distribution. As such, it is challenging to reconcile the measured shadow lobbyist effect with the 20% working time threshold for registering as a lobbyist. Based on our estimates, the contribution of unregistered ex-Congressional officials could explain 4.9% of the increase in sectoral revenues, compared to 24.0% for the group of registered officials.

Funder

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Publisher

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Reference49 articles.

1. Arnsdorf, I (2016) ‘Daschle is Officially a Lobbyist Now’. Politico, March 29th.

2. Auble, D (2013) ‘Lobbyists 2012: Out of the Game or Under the Radar?’. Center for Responsive Politics Report. Washington.

3. Auble, D (2014) ‘Waning Influence? Tracking the ‘Unlobbyist”. Center for Responsive Politics Occasional Report. Washington.

4. Besley, T (2005) ‘Political Selection’. The Journal of Economic Perpectives. 19(3): 43-60.

5. Bertrand, M; Bombardini, M; Fisman, R and Trebbi, F (2014) ‘Is it Whom You Know or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process’. American Economic Review. 110(7):2065-2102.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3