Voting Rights, Deindustrialization, and Republican Ascendancy in the South

Author:

Wright Gavin1

Affiliation:

1. William Robertson Coe Professor of American Economic History, Emeritus

Abstract

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 revolutionized politics in the American South. These changes also had economic consequences, generating gains for white as well as Black southerners. Contrary to the widespread belief that the region turned Republican in direct response to the Civil Rights Revolution, expanded voting rights led to twenty-five years of competitive two-party politics, featuring strong biracial coalitions in the Democratic Party. These coalitions remained competitive in most states until the Republican Revolution of the 1990s. This abrupt rightward shift had many causes, but critical for southern voters were the trade liberalization measures of 1994, specifically NAFTA and the phase-out of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement which had protected the textiles and apparel industries for decades. The consequences of Republican state regimes have been severe, including intensified racial polarization, loss of support for public schools and higher education, and harsh policies toward low-income populations.

Publisher

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Reference136 articles.

1. Abramowitz, Alan I., Brad Alexander, and Matthew Gunning. “Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections,” Journal of Politics 68 (2006): 75-88.

2. Aistrup, Joseph A. The Southern Strategy Revisited. Lexington KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1996. ISBN-13 : 978-0813119045

3. Aneja, Abhay P., and Carlos F. Avenancio-Leon, “The Effect of Political Power on Labor Market Inequality: Evidence from the 1965 Voting Rights Act,” working paper (2019).

4. Ansolabehere, Stephen; Nathan Persily; and Charles Stewart III. “Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act,” Harvard Law Review 123 (2010): 1385-1436. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40648373

5. Ansolabehere, Stephen; Nathan Persily; and Charles Stewart III. “Regional Differences in Racial Polarization in the 2012 Presidential Election: Implications for the Constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act,” Harvard Law Review Forum 126 (2013): 205-220. https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/04/regional-differences-in-racial-polarization-in-the-2012-presidential-election-implications-for-the-constitutionality-of-section-5-of-the-voting-rights-act/

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3