Local David Versus Global Goliath: Populist Parties and the Decline of Progressive Politics in Italy

Author:

Cavallaro MatteoORCID

Abstract

This paper analyzes the role of local spending, particularly on social welfare, and local inequality as factors in the Italian political crisis following the adoption in 2011 of more radical national austerity measures. We employ two different methods. First, we develop an original database of municipal budgets. There we show that even the lowest level of social welfare spending, that offered by Italian municipalities, though also hit by austerity, was still able to moderate this national shock. We test three operationalizations of local spending: aggregate current expenditures, aggregate current expenditures on social services, and current expenditures disaggregated by function. We show that municipal current expenditures, particularly on social spending, significantly affected the post-2011 share of votes for the progressive coalition. The results also show that social spending, especially on education, significantly moderated the combined effect of national austerity and the economic crisis on voting for populist radical right parties, while no significant results appeared for populist parties in general. Local inequality appears to significantly enhance vote shares of populist radical right parties and populist parties in general. We caution that, although significant, the effect is not strong: that local policy and economic conditions can moderate national shocks but cannot reverse them. The second analysis relies on survey data to ascertain the individual-level mechanisms behind the role of local welfare. The paper argues that local economic inputs influence voters’ position on non-economic issues. Our results, however, do not identify any significant individual-level channel of transmission, be it cultural or economic.

Funder

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Publisher

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Reference88 articles.

1. Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Markus Wagner. 2020. ‘Electoral Fortunes of Social Democratic Parties: Do Second Dimension Positions Matter?’ Journal of European Public Policy 27 (2): 246–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1701532.

2. Albanese, Giuseppe, Guglielmo Barone, and Guido de Blasio. 2019. ‘Populist Voting and Losers’ Discontent: Does Redistribution Matter’. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche" Marco Fanno"https://ideas.repec.org/p/pad/wpaper/0239.html.

3. Algan, Yann, Sergei Guriev, Elias Papaioannou, and Evgenia Passari. 2017. ‘The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism’. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2017 (2): 309–400.

4. Anderson, Joel, Ioannis Andreadis, Patrick Dumont, Andrea De Angelis, Jan Fivas, Thomas Fossen, Kostas Gemenis, Carolien Van Ham, Raphaël Kies, and André Krouwel. 2014. Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates: Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective. Ecpr Press.

5. Ball, Laurence M., LBall@imf.org, Davide Furceri, DFurceri@imf.org, Daniel Leigh, DLeigh@imf.org, Prakash Loungani, and PLoungani@imf.org. 2013. ‘The Distributional Effects of Fiscal Consolidation’. IMF Working Papers 13 (151): 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475551945.001.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3