Affiliation:
1. Chairman of the Economic Development and Review Committee, OECD
Abstract
It is becoming increasingly accepted that lowering interest rates might at some point prove contractionary (the “reversal interest rate”) if lower lending margins cut the supply of bank loans. This paper argues that there are many other reasons to question reliance on monetary policy to provide economic stimulus, particularly over successive financial cycles. By encouraging the issue of debt, often for unproductive purposes, monetary stimulus becomes increasingly ineffective over time. Moreover, it threatens financial stability in a variety of ways, it leads to real resource misallocations that lower potential growth, and it finally produces a policy “debt trap” that cannot be escaped without significant economic costs. Debt-deflation and high inflation are both plausible outcomes.
Publisher
Institute for New Economic Thinking
Reference74 articles.
1. Acharya, V (2019) “Monetary easing, leveraged payouts and lack of investment” Presentation at Imperial College London, 12-13 December.
2. Acharya A, M Krosignani, T Eisert and C Eufinger (2020) “Zombie Credit and (Dis)Inflation: Evidence from Europe” Staff Report 944, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York, December.
3. Agarwal R and M S Kimbal (2019) “Enabling deep negative interest rates to fight recessions: a guide” IMF Working Paper 84, Washington DC, April.
4. Aliaj O and E Platt (2021) “Baupost’s Seth Klarman compares investors to ‘frogs in boiling water’” Financial Times, 21 January.
5. Altavilla C, L Burlon, M Giannetti and S Holton (2019) “The impact of negative interest rates on banks and firms” Vox, 8 November.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献