The Pursuit of Shareholder Value: Cisco’s Transformation from Innovation to Financialization

Author:

Carpenter MarieORCID, ,Lazonick William,

Abstract

Once the global leader in telecommunication systems and the Internet, over the past two decades the United States has fallen behind global competitors, and in particular China, in mobile communication infrastructure—specifically 5G and Internet of Things (IoT). This national failure, with the socioeconomic and geopolitical tensions that it creates, is not due to a lack of US government investment in the knowledge required for the mobility revolution. Nor is it because of a dearth of domestic demand for the equipment, devices, and applications that can make use of this infrastructure. Rather, the problem is the dereliction of key US-based business corporations to take the lead in making the investments in organizational learning required to generate cutting edge communication-infrastructure products. No company in the United States exemplifies this deficiency more than Cisco Systems, the business corporation founded in Silicon Valley in 1984 that had explosive growth in the 1990s to become the foremost global enterprise-networking equipment producer in the Internet revolution. This paper provides in-depth analysis of Cisco’s organizational failure, attributing it ultimately to the company’s turn from innovation in the last decades of 20th century to financialization in the early decades of the 21st century. Since 2001, Cisco’s top management has chosen to allocate corporate cash to open-market share repurchases— aka stock buybacks—for the purpose of giving manipulative boosts to the company stock price rather than make the investments in organizational learning required to become a world leader in communication-infrastructure equipment for the era of 5G and IoT. From October 2001 through October 2022, Cisco spent $152.3 billion—95 percent of its net income over the period—on stock buybacks for the purpose of propping up its stock price. These funds wasted in pursuit of “maximizing shareholder value” were on top of the $55.5 billion that Cisco paid out to shareholders in dividends, representing an additional 35 percent of net income. In this paper, we trace how Cisco grew from a Silicon Valley startup in 1984 to become, through its innovative products, the world leader in enterprise-networking equipment over the next decade and a half. As the company entered the 21st century, building on its dominance of enterprise-networking, Cisco was positioned to upgrade its technological capabilities to become a major infrastructureequipment vendor to service providers. We analyze how and why, when the Internet boom turned to bust in 2001, the organizational structure that enabled Cisco to dominate enterprise networking posed constraints related to manufacturing and marketing on the company’s growth in the more sophisticated infrastructure-equipment segment. We then document how from 2002 Cisco turned from innovation to financialization, as it used its ample profits to do stock buybacks to prop up its stock price. Finally, we ponder the larger policy implications of Cisco’s turn from innovation to financialization for the competitive position of the US information-and-communication technology (ICT) industry in the global economy.

Publisher

Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series

Reference207 articles.

1. 1. Amadeo, R. (2021) "From first to sixth: Huawei's phone business tanks thanks to U.S. sanctions," ARS Technica, January 28,.  https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/huaweis-phone-sales-plummet-42-percent-in-q4-2020-its-now-in-sixth-place/

2. 2. Atkinson, R. D. (2020) "New report shows unfair Chinese government support for Huawei and ZTE has harmed global telecom equipment innovation," Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, June 22. https://itif.org/publications/2020/06/22/new-report-shows-unfair-chinese-government-support-huawei-and-zte-has-harmed/

3. 3. Austin, R. D., Nolan, R. L., & Cotteleer, M. J. (1998) "Cisco Systems, Inc.: Implementing ERP," Harvard Business School Case No 9-699-022, October 20. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=22966

4. 4. Avery, S. (2000) "Cisco in uphill battle with Nortel: Fight in optical market," National Post, August 7.

5. 5. Barron's (2013) "Linksys deal could boost Cisco, Netgear," Barron's, January 28.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Making and Re-Making an Industry;The Oxford Handbook of Industry Dynamics;2023-11-20

2. Sick with “shareholder value”: US pharma’s financialized business model during the pandemic;Competition & Change;2023-11-14

3. Innovative Enterprise, Industrial Leadership, and Sustainable Prosperity;The Oxford Handbook of Industry Dynamics;2023-10-23

4. Investing in Innovation;2023-08-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3