Author:
Farliana Nina,Widhiastuti Ratieh,Rahmaningtyas Wisudani,Nurdiana Atika
Abstract
The number of students who commit academic fraud is a behaviour that is not commendable and should not occur in the academic environment. This study aims to test whether there is an influence between pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and ability on academic cheating behaviour with extracurricular activities as a moderating variable. This study uses a quantitative approach. The population in this study was 7.029. Samples were taken using the Slovin formula for as many as 379 students, and the sampling technique used proportional random sampling. Methods of data collection using a questionnaire. The data analysis method used is descriptive statistical analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The study results show that pressure positively affects academic cheating behaviour by 11.36%. An opportunity has a positive effect on academic cheating behaviour by 5.52%. Then, Rationalization has a positive effect on academic cheating behaviour by 18.84%. The ability has a positive effect on academic cheating behaviour by 42.77%. The implication is extracurricular activities can strengthen the influence of pressure, rationalization and ability on academic cheating behaviour. However, unable to moderate the effect of opportunity on academic cheating. This research suggests that exam supervisors can tighten supervision, and students can foster self-confidence.
Publisher
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Adriayana, R. (2019). Pengaruh Orientasi Etika, Rasionalisasi, dan Self Efficacy terhadap Kecurangan Akademik. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 22(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.31941/jebi.v22i01.765.
2. Albrecht, W. S., Albercht, C. O., Albercht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
3. Alviani, V. N., Kurniawan, A., & Sugiharto, B. (2016). The Influence of Academic Pressure, Opportunity of Cheating and Rationalization of Cheating on the Behaviour of Academic Cheating With Perception of Accounting Ethics As a Moderating Variable (on Stie Sutaatmadja Subang Accounting Students). Accounting Research Journal Os Sutaatmadja (Accruals), 1(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.35310/jass.v1i01.69.
4. Amalia, U. T., & Nurkhin, A. (2019). Dimensi Diamond Fraud dan Penggunaan Smartphone Terhadap Academic Fraud Dengan Religiusitas Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Economic Education Analysis Journal (EEAJ), 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v8i1.
5. Andayani, Y., & Sari, V. F. (2019). Pengaruh daya saing, gender, fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa. Jurnal Akplorasi Akutansi, 1(3), 1458–1471. http://jea.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/jea/article/view/155.