Formative and Summative Assessment Using Technology: A Critical Review

Author:

Onasanya Samuel Adebisi,Ajamu Adesoye Oladunni

Abstract

The use of technology in the classroom has revolutionized the teaching process by giving educators more freedom and opportunities to differentiate instruction. The purpose of this research is to critically assess a variety of technological approaches that were particularly chosen for their compatibility with and ability to improve on existing assessment for learning practices. The underlying viewpoints are that (a) summative and formative evaluations are both important learning opportunities, and (b) utilizing technology can improve learning throughout evaluation and feedback processes. The research method uses Systematic Literature Review (SLR). A literature search was conducted through academic databases, such as PubMed, ERIC, and Google Scholar. The benefits and downsides of employing technology are evaluated using research from a research study through literature. It is said that the usage of various forms of technology can aid in the facilitation of efficient assessment for learning and feedback in higher education by adopting a flexible strategy and taking tiny incremental steps. In a supportive learning environment, where a staff-student approach can be particularly helpful, trust between students and staff can help innovative methods succeed.

Publisher

Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Reference55 articles.

1. Balakrishnan Nair, B. (2022). Endorsing gamification pedagogy as a helpful strategy to offset the COVID-19 induced disruptions in tourism education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 30(July 2021), 100362.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100362.

2. Basyoni, A., Bee, M., S., H., Seng, G., & H. (2020). The effectiveness of using students’ created digital storytelling in enhancing Saudi ninth graders’ critical listening skills. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 16(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/https://www.jesoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/JESOC16-030.pdf.

3. Cahyono, B. Y., Mukminatien, N., & Amrina, R. (2016). Indonesian Students Writing Proficiency in Using Complex Sentence. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 4(9), 22–32. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bambang-Cahyono-3/publication/311707316.

4. Charlina, C., & Septyanti, E. (2019). Pemanfaatan media kahoots sebagai motivasi belajar mengikuti kuis wacana bahasa Indonesia. Geram (Gerakan Aktif Menulis, 7(2), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2019.vol7(2).4036.

5. Dias, S. B., Hadjileontiadou, S. J., Diniz, J., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2020). DeepLMS: a deep learning predictive model for supporting online learning in the Covid-19 era. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19888. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76740-9.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3