Analysis of Middle School Mathematics and Science Curriculum Learning Outcomes According to TIMSS-2019 Evaluation Frameworks

Author:

OK Gökçe1ORCID,KAYA Deniz2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Göç İdaresi Başkanlığı

2. NEVSEHIR HACI BEKTAS VELI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the cognitive qualities of the learning outcomes in middle school mathematics and science curricula according to grade levels and learning fields. In the study, case design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used and the data were collected with the help of document analysis technique. The learning outcomes in the middle school mathematics and science curricula published by the Ministry of National Education Board of Education and Discipline in 2018 were discussed on the axis of cognitive domains and sub-dimensions in the TIMSS-2019 evaluation frameworks. Descriptive analysis technique was used to examine the learning outcomes in the curricula. In this context, 215 outcome expressions in the mathematics curriculum and 223 learning outcome expressions in the science curriculum were evaluated. According to the findings of the study, while 46.6% of the learning outcomes in the mathematics curriculum are in the domain of knowing, 36.6% of them are in the applying, 16.8% of them are in the reasoning cognitive domain; 27.1% of the learning outcomes in the science curriculum are in the knowing, 32.4% of them are in the applying and 40.5% of them are in the reasoning cognitive domain. According to the findings, it was suggested that learning outcomes should be updated to include more metacognitive skills, and that primary and secondary teaching programs should be evaluated according to similar frameworks.

Publisher

Bartin Universitesi

Reference52 articles.

1. Aktan, O. (2020). İlkokul matematik öğretim programı dersi kazanımlarının yenilenen Bloom taksonomisine göre incelenmesi [Investigation of primary school mathematics curriculum lesson acquisitions according to renewed Bloom taxonomy]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 48, 15-36. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.523545

2. Avcı, F., Aslangiray, H., & Özyalçın, Ö. B. (2021). 2018 Fen Bilimleri öğretim programı kazanımlarının konu alanları ve sınıf düzeyi açısından yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomisine göre analizi ve değerlendirilmesi [Analysis and evaluation of the learning outcomes of the 2018 science curriculum according to revised Bloom taxonomy in terms of subject and class level]. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(2), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.689366

3. Baysura, Ö. D. (2017). TIMSS matematik sorularının matematik öğretim programı ve TEOG matematik soruları kapsamında incelenmesi [An analysis of TIMSS mathematics items within the context of mathematics curriculum and TEOG mathematics items]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yıldız Teknik University.

4. Birgin, O. (2016). Bloom taksonomisi [Bloom taxonomy]. In. E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler [Theories in Mathematics Education] (pp. 839-860). Pegem Publishing.

5. Bostan-Sarıoğlan, A., Dolu, G., & Sevim, N. (2021). Sekizinci sınıf merkezi sınavlardaki fen sorularının TIMSS-2019 bilişsel alanları göre analizi [Analysis of science questions in eighth-grade central exams according to cognitive fields of TIMSS-2019]. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 8, 514-533. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.973021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3