Affiliation:
1. Göç İdaresi Başkanlığı
2. NEVSEHIR HACI BEKTAS VELI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine the cognitive qualities of the learning outcomes in middle school mathematics and science curricula according to grade levels and learning fields. In the study, case design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used and the data were collected with the help of document analysis technique. The learning outcomes in the middle school mathematics and science curricula published by the Ministry of National Education Board of Education and Discipline in 2018 were discussed on the axis of cognitive domains and sub-dimensions in the TIMSS-2019 evaluation frameworks. Descriptive analysis technique was used to examine the learning outcomes in the curricula. In this context, 215 outcome expressions in the mathematics curriculum and 223 learning outcome expressions in the science curriculum were evaluated. According to the findings of the study, while 46.6% of the learning outcomes in the mathematics curriculum are in the domain of knowing, 36.6% of them are in the applying, 16.8% of them are in the reasoning cognitive domain; 27.1% of the learning outcomes in the science curriculum are in the knowing, 32.4% of them are in the applying and 40.5% of them are in the reasoning cognitive domain. According to the findings, it was suggested that learning outcomes should be updated to include more metacognitive skills, and that primary and secondary teaching programs should be evaluated according to similar frameworks.
Reference52 articles.
1. Aktan, O. (2020). İlkokul matematik öğretim programı dersi kazanımlarının yenilenen Bloom taksonomisine göre incelenmesi [Investigation of primary school mathematics curriculum lesson acquisitions according to renewed Bloom taxonomy]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 48, 15-36. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.523545
2. Avcı, F., Aslangiray, H., & Özyalçın, Ö. B. (2021). 2018 Fen Bilimleri öğretim programı kazanımlarının konu alanları ve sınıf düzeyi açısından yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomisine göre analizi ve değerlendirilmesi [Analysis and evaluation of the learning outcomes of the 2018 science curriculum according to revised Bloom taxonomy in terms of subject and class level]. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(2), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.689366
3. Baysura, Ö. D. (2017). TIMSS matematik sorularının matematik öğretim programı ve TEOG matematik soruları kapsamında incelenmesi [An analysis of TIMSS mathematics items within the context of mathematics curriculum and TEOG mathematics items]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yıldız Teknik University.
4. Birgin, O. (2016). Bloom taksonomisi [Bloom taxonomy]. In. E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler [Theories in Mathematics Education] (pp. 839-860). Pegem Publishing.
5. Bostan-Sarıoğlan, A., Dolu, G., & Sevim, N. (2021). Sekizinci sınıf merkezi sınavlardaki fen sorularının TIMSS-2019 bilişsel alanları göre analizi [Analysis of science questions in eighth-grade central exams according to cognitive fields of TIMSS-2019]. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 8, 514-533. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.973021