Readability of Australian Road Safety Information for the General Public

Author:

Ferguson Catherine1,Winn Stephen1

Affiliation:

1. School of Education, Edith Cowan University

Abstract

This research was conducted as a result of the authors becoming aware of the Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS) submission to the National Road Safety Strategy 2021-2030. The ACRS submission outlined six key elements, one of which suggested that the National Road Safety Strategy should include 'Publication in easily consumable form, for the public, of infrastructure safety star ratings for all road users' (ACRS, 2021, p.61). This prompted the researchers to consider the road safety information provided to the general public about driving behaviour. Forty excerpts from online data from one Australian State's road safety website were assessed for readability using an online tool. Fifteen additional excerpts from another three States were assessed to ensure consistency across Australia. Results indicated that the excerpts assessed were written at a readability level that is too high for almost half of the Australian public. Recommendations include that those producing road safety information consider the level of literacy across the general public and ensure that their work becomes increasingly accessible to more Australians. The limitations of readability are acknowledged in relation to the overall communications which often include pictures and/or diagrams.

Publisher

Australasian College of Road Safety

Subject

Safety Research,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Transportation,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference40 articles.

1. Australasian College of Road Safety. (2021). ACRS News. Journal of Road Safety, 32(2), 61.

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Household use of information technology. ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/technology-and-innovation/household-use-information-technology/latest-release

3. Australian Government. (n.d.). Style Manual. Retrieved May 17, 2021, from https://www.stylemanual.gov.au

4. Burke, V., & Greenberg, D. (2010). Determining Readability: How to Select and Apply Easy-to-Use Readability Formulas to Assess the Difficulty of Adult Literacy Materials. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 4(1), 34–43. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/71833/

5. Cheng, C., & Dunn, M. (2015). Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Australian’s and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/753-6405.12341

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3