Approaches to Managing Speed in New Zealand’s Capital
-
Published:2023-02-08
Issue:1
Volume:34
Page:12-22
-
ISSN:2652-4252
-
Container-title:Journal of Road Safety
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JRS
Author:
Mandic Sandra1, Hewitt Joe1, Dodge Nadine1, Sharma Neha1
Affiliation:
1. Wellington City Council, Wellington, New Zealand
Abstract
Higher speeds increase the risk of crashes occurring and the severity of resulting injuries. The purpose of speed management is to ensure that speeds are safe for all road users thereby reducing the number of crashes and avoid injuries and deaths when crashes happen. In response to a rising trend in deaths from road crashes in recent years, the New Zealand Government introduced the Road to Zero road safety strategy in 2018 and updated the Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits in 2022. In Wellington city (New Zealand’s capital), unsafe speed limits and high numbers of road crashes with injuries make city streets unsafe, have high social costs, present a barrier to active transport, and limit mode choice for residents and visitors. This study assessed nine speed management options using cost benefit analysis. Citywide permanent speed reduction was most effective for reducing road crash-related injuries. The option with 30 km/h speed limit for local streets and 40 km/h for arterial streets had the highest crash reduction benefits of over NZD $500 million, discounted over 40 years followed by the option of 30 km/h default citywide, albeit with the high construction costs and relatively high vehicle travel time disbenefits. Incremental cost benefit calculations indicated that, depending on the total budget available, the most efficient options were permanent speed reductions near schools and the 30/40 km/h mix citywide. Implementing variable speed limits around schools provided the lowest benefits and very low value for money compared to citywide speed management approaches or permanently reduced speed around schools.
Publisher
Australasian College of Road Safety
Subject
Safety Research,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Transportation,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference36 articles.
1. AIMSUN. (n.d.). AIMSUM User Manual. Retrieved July 21, 2022, from https://docs.aimsun.com/next/22.0.1/UsersManual/TrafficManagement.html 2. Aldred, R., Goodman, A., Gulliver, J., & Woodcock, J. (2018). Cycling injury risk in London: A case-control study exploring the impact of cycle volumes, motor vehicle volumes, and road characteristics including speed limits. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 117, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.003 3. Cairns, J., Warren, J., Garthwaite, K., Greig, G., & Bambra, C. (2014). Go slow: an umbrella review of the effects of 20 mph zones and limits on health and health inequalities. Journal of Public Health, 37(3), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu067 4. Doecke, S. D., Dutschke, J. K., Baldock, M. R. J., & Kloeden, C. N. (2021). Travel speed and the risk of serious injury in vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 161, 106359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106359 5. Duncan, S., White, K., Mavoa, S., Stewart, T., Hinckson, E., & Schofield, G. (2016). Active transport, physical activity, and distance between home and school in children and adolescents. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 13(4), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0054
|
|