Abstract
In this paper, we study the impact of land property rights on migration in rural areas. We use whether property rights are well protected as a judgment to verify the impact between the two. We used data from 2013 and 2014 for our analysis. From the probit chart, we can conclude that when land property rights are well protected, people will choose to emigrate. We used the rental ratio to confirm that land rights were well protected. When property rights are not well protected people will stay where they are. We use government acquisition of land to analyze that land rights are not well protected.
Reference42 articles.
1. Au, C. C., & Henderson, J. V. (2006). How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China. Journal of Development Economics, 80(2), 350–388.
2. Bennett, M. T. (2008). China’s sloping land conversion program:
3. Institutional innovation or business as usual?. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 699–711.
4. Bowlus, A. J., & Sicular, T. (2003). Moving toward markets? Labor allocation in rural China. Journal of Development Economics, 71(2), 561–583.
5. Chan, N. (2003). Land acquisition compensation in China: Problems & answers. International Real Estate Review, 6(1), 136–152.