Abstract
Spousal homicide has become one of China's most common forms of femicide. Therefore, the investigation of systematic gender bias and gender in-group bias in imprisonment decisions is conducted in this study to explore the fairness and impartiality of the Chinese judicial system. Fifty random intentional spousal homicide cases in China are analysed using the context analysis method. The study found a large similarity between the judicial decision made by female and male judges; however, male plaintiffs have a larger chance of receiving sentences of life imprisonment and the death penalty from judges of either gender. Moreover, excluding life imprisonment and the death penalty, plaintiffs of identical gender as the judge are more likely to receive slightly shorter sentences, suggesting a slight in-group gender bias in the judicial decision in China.
Reference26 articles.
1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, A global study on homicide, 2019.
2. I. Armstrong, Women and their ‘uncontrollable impulses’: The medicalisation of women's crime and differential gender sentencing, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1999, DOI: 10.1080/13218719909524949.
3. H. Lu, B. Liang & S. Liu, Serious Violent Offenses and Sentencing Decisions in China—Are There Any Gender Disparities? Asian Criminology 8, 2013, pp.159–177, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-012-9155-x.
4. L. Crites, Women Offenders: Myth vs Reality, The Female Offender, Lexington, Mass., 1976 Lexington Books.
5. X. Cai, P. Li, Y. Lu, H. Song, Gender In-Group Bias: Evidence from the Judicial Decisions, 2021.