Abstract
This article aims to measure the technological gap of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the new technological revolution and propose policy recommendations for optimizing innovation routes. To this end, this paper establishes a technology gap test model through the indices of paper activity power, paper influence, patent activity power, patent influence, and patent market power, at the same time, the Gordon method is used to standardize scoring, in order to clarify the fine-grained technology gap between China, the United States, Europe, Japan, and South Korea in the field of the Internet of Things. Through comparative research, it has been found that China's IoT technology innovation is in a paralleling competitive stage with Europe, America, Japan, and South Korea, but there are issues such as weak international competitiveness. Therefore, policy recommendations for optimizing innovative routes are proposed for problem research, in order to provide support for relevant research and policy decisions.
Reference7 articles.
1. WIPO. Appendix I-The Global Innovation Index rational and origins, its conceptual framework and data limitations [EB/OL]. (2021-09-20) [2023-03-25]. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_ 2000-appendix1.pdf.
2. Edyta Bielińska-Dusza et al. Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification [EB/OL]. (2021-02-18) [2023-03-25]. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2199.
3. Squicciarini M et al. Measuring patent quality: indicators of technological and economic value[R]. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Paris: OECD,2013.
4. Sang-Jin Ahn. Three characteristics of technology competition by IoT-driven digitization, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 157(8): 120062.
5. Zhou Zhang, Xiaoping Li, et al. A global race to dominate the internet of things: how China caught up. Journal of Business Strategy,2022, 43(4): 199-209.