Author:
Huang Huayi,Jefferson Emily R,Gotink Mark,Sinclair Carol,Mercer Stewart W,Guthrie Bruce
Abstract
BackgroundScotland abolished the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in April 2016, before implementing a new Scottish GP contract in April 2018. Since 2016, groups of practices (GP clusters) have been incentivised to meet regularly to plan and organise quality improvement (QI) as part of this new direction in primary care policy.AimTo understand the organisation and perceived impact of GP clusters, including how they use quantitative data for improvement.Design and settingThematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (n = 17) and observations of GP cluster meetings (n = 6) in two clusters.MethodThis analytical strategy was combined with a purposive (variation) sampling approach to the sources of data, to try to identify commonalities across diverse stakeholder experiences of working in or on the idea of GP clusters. Variation was sought particularly in terms of stakeholders’ level of involvement in improvement initiatives, and in their disciplinary affiliations.ResultsThere was uncertainty as to whether GP clusters should focus on activities generated internally or externally by the wider healthcare system (for example, from Scottish Health Boards), although the two observed clusters generally generated their own ideas and issues. Clusters operated with variable administrative/managerial and data support, and variable baseline leadership experience and QI skills. Qualitative approaches formed the focus of collaborative learning in cluster meetings, through sharing and discussion of member practices’ own understandings and experiences. Less evidence was observed of data analytics being championed in these meetings, partly because of barriers to accessing the analytics data and existing data quality.ConclusionCluster development would benefit from more consistent training and support for cluster leads in small-group facilitation, leadership, and QI expertise, and data analytics access and capacity. While GP clusters are up and running, their impact is likely to be limited without further investment in developing capacity in these areas.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference39 articles.
1. How to get started in quality improvement
2. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (2016) Quality Improvement — training for better outcomes, https://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Quality_improvement_training_better_outcomes_140316-2.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2021).
3. Royal College of General Practitioners QI regional champions. https://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/our-programmes/quality-improvement/qi-regional-champions.aspx (accessed 15 Jul 2021).
4. Gosling J Mays N Erens B (2019) Quality improvement in general practice: what do GPs and practice managers think? https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/upload/publications/2019/2019-THF-QI_GeneralPractice.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2021).
5. The development of the Primary Care Clusters Multidimensional Assessment (PCCMA): A mixed-methods study
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献