Primary care clinicians’ perspectives on interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions: a systematic review

Author:

Briscoe Simon,Thompson Coon Jo,Melendez-Torres G J,Abbott Rebecca,Shaw Liz,Nunns Michael,Garside Ruth

Abstract

BackgroundStudies have found that women with gynaecological conditions and symptoms do not feel listened to by primary care clinicians. Less understood is whether primary care clinicians perceive that there are challenges around listening to and interacting with this patient group.AimThis study aims to understand primary care clinicians’ perspectives on the challenges of listening to and interacting with women patients with gynaecological conditions and symptoms.Design & settingSystematic reviewMethodWe searched ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC and MEDLINE from inception to July 2023. We also conducted forward and backward citation searches of included studies. Identified records were screened independently by two reviewers. Data-extraction was undertaken by one reviewer and checked by a second. Quality appraisal used the Wallace checklist. “Best-fit” framework synthesis was used to synthesise findings around themes which explore the challenges of patient-clinician interaction.ResultsWe identified 25 relevant papers. Perceived challenges associated with listening to and interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions and symptoms were identified at four ‘levels’: Individual clinician factors; structural and organisational factors; community and external factors; and factors related to gynaecological conditions. Interpretive analysis identified specific challenges relating to socio-cultural factors affecting the consultation experience; the need for further education, training or guidance for clinicians; factors affecting referral decisions; and factors related to service structure and organisation.ConclusionsPrimary care clinicians acknowledge that empathy, respect and attentive listening are important when interacting with women patients with gynaecological conditions and symptoms. However, these ideals are impeded by several factors.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3