Doctors’ experiences when treating doctor-patients: a scoping review

Author:

Hutton Claire JORCID,Kay Margaret,Round PennyORCID,Barton Chris

Abstract

BackgroundTo work effectively, doctors need to look after themselves. They often delay seeking medical care for a range of reasons. Once they do, there is evidence that treating doctors can struggle to provide optimal care.AimTo examine existing literature on what is currently known about experiences for treating doctors, in particular general practitioners, when their patient is also a doctor.Design & settingScoping reviewMethodUsing the JBI methodological framework for scoping reviews, five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Scopus) were searched from start date until December 31, 2022. Qualitative and quantitative studies reporting the treating doctor’s experience, guidelines for treating doctors, expert opinion articles and editorials were included. Grey literature was considered, searching the first ten pages of two Google searches.ResultsForty-eight articles from eight countries met inclusion criteria, of which 12 were research studies. Four areas of focus were:Affective dimensions: anxiety about being criticised, concern about upsetting the doctor-patient, discomfort regarding the acknowledgement that doctors get sick;Relational dimensions: Boundary issues, over-identifying with the doctor-patient, treating them as a colleague rather than a patient;Confidentiality: Incorporating both affective and relational aspects;Influence of medical socialisation on dynamics between treating doctor and doctor-patient.These findings are distilled into a list of key suggestions for the treating doctor.ConclusionsDoctors can find treating doctor-patients anxiety-provoking and challenging. The sources of this discomfort are multifaceted, and more empirical research is needed to better understand and address the complex relationship between treating doctor and doctor-patient.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3