Multidimensional factors of burnout in general practice: a cross sectional survey

Author:

Bayot MarieORCID,Boone AnkeORCID,Godderis LodeORCID,Lenoir Anne-LaureORCID

Abstract

Background GPs are particularly vulnerable to job burnout. Tailored prevention and intervention strategies are needed. Aim To investigate organisational, interpersonal, and individual factors contributing to exhaustion and disengagement at work among GPs. Design & setting We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of Belgian GPs. Method A total of 358 doctors (73% females, 301 with complete data) completed an online anonymous questionnaire assessing job burnout, psychosocial characteristics of the work environment, perceived social support in the private domain, emotional competence, and self-compassion. Results GPs reported moderate levels of exhaustion and disengagement. Regression models showed that included factors jointly explained 69% of the variance in exhaustion and 63% in disengagement. Exhaustion was significantly predicted by female sex ( β effect size = −0.1), high perceived emotional demands ( β = 0.19), as well as low self-compassion ( β = −0.14) and low emotional competence ( β = 0.09). Disengagement was significantly predicted by low seniority ( β = −0.12) and limited opportunities for development ( β = −0.16). Both exhaustion and disengagement were predicted by low perceived quality of work ( β = −0.19 and −0.14, respectively), meaning of work ( β = −0.17 and −0.31, respectively), and role clarity ( β = 0.09 and 0.12, respectively), as well as high perceived work–life conflict ( β = 0.46 and 0.21, respectively). Moreover, GPs working in a multidisciplinary group reported lower levels of exhaustion and disengagement than those working in a monodisciplinary group or a solo practice, and this difference was associated with factors such as work–life conflict. Conclusion Organisational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors interact to predict a substantial part of burnout in general practice. The most significant risk factors were perceived work–life conflict and poor meaning of work. Policymakers should work to support more sustainable practices based on the specific needs and constraints reported by GPs.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3