Longitudinal realist evaluation of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) intervention: protocol

Author:

Wheat HannahORCID,Weston Lauren,Oh Tomasina M,Morgan-Trimmer Sarah,Ingram Wendy,Griffiths Sarah,Sheaff Rod,Clarkson Paul,Medina-Lara Antonieta,Musicha Crispin,Spicer Stuart,Ukoumunne ObiohaORCID,Allgar Victoria,Creanor Siobhan,Clark Michael,Quinn Cath,Gude Alex,McCabe Rose,Batool Saqba,Smith Lorna,Richards Debra,Shafi Hannah,Warwick Bethany,Lasrado Reena,Hussain Basharat,Jones Hannah,Dalkin Sonia,Bate Angela,Sherriff Ian,Robinson Louise,Byng Richard

Abstract

BackgroundDifferent dementia support roles exist but evidence is lacking on which aspects are best, for whom, and in what circumstances, and on their associated costs and benefits. Phase 1 of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team programme (D-PACT) developed a post-diagnostic primary care-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers and assessed the feasibility of a trial.AimPhase 2 of the programme aims to 1) refine the programme theory on how, when, and for whom the intervention works; and 2) evaluate its value and impact.Design & settingA realist longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation will be conducted in urban, rural, and coastal areas across South West and North West England where low-income or ethnic minority populations (for example, South Asian) are represented. Design was informed by patient, public, and professional stakeholder input and phase 1 findings.MethodHigh-volume qualitative and quantitative data will be collected longitudinally from people with dementia, carers, and practitioners. Analyses will comprise the following: 1) realist longitudinal case studies; 2) conversation analysis of recorded interactions; 3) statistical analyses of outcome and experience questionnaires; 4a) health economic analysis examining costs of delivery; and 4b) realist economic analysis of high-cost events and ‘near misses’. All findings will be synthesised using a joint display table, evidence appraisal tool, triangulation, and stakeholder co-analysis.ConclusionThe realist evaluation will describe how, why, and for whom the intervention does or does not lead to change over time. It will also demonstrate how a non-randomised design can be more appropriate for complex interventions with similar questions or populations.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference33 articles.

1. Dowrick A Southern A (2014) Dementia 2014: opportunity for change. accessed. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/migrate/downloads/dementia_2014_opportunity_for_change.pdf. 27 Jun 2023.

2. HM Government (2022) Health and Care Act 2022. accessed. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/31/contents/enacted. 27 Jun 2023.

3. The Costs of Caregiving: Exploring the Perceived Burden of Dementia among Bangladeshi Caregivers in Britain

4. ‘It’s a huge maze, the system, it’s a terrible maze’: Dementia carers’ constructions of navigating health and social care services

5. Multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a community group exercise programme and home-based exercise with usual care for people aged 65 years and over in primary care

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3