Author:
Yu Victor,Wyatt Steven,Woodall Michael,Mahmud Sultan,Klaire Vijay,Bailey Karla,Mohammed Mohammed Amin
Abstract
BackgroundNew healthcare models are being explored to enhance care coordination, efficiency, and outcomes. Evidence is scarce regarding the impact of vertical integration of primary and secondary care on emergency department (ED) attendances, unplanned hospital admissions, and readmissions.AimTo examine the impact of vertical integration of an NHS provider hospital and 10 general practices on unplanned hospital careDesign and settingA retrospective database study using synthetic controls of an NHS hospital in Wolverhampton integrated with 10 general practices, providing primary medical services for 67 402 registered patients.MethodFor each vertical integration GP practice, a synthetic counterpart was constructed. The difference in rate of ED attendances, unplanned hospital admissions, and unplanned hospital readmissions was compared, and pooled across vertical integration practices versus synthetic control practices pre-intervention versus post-intervention.ResultsAcross the 10 practices, pooled rates of ED attendances did not change significantly after vertical integration. However, there were statistically significant reductions in the rates of unplanned hospital admissions (−0.11, 95% CI = −0.18 to −0.045, P = 0.0012) and unplanned hospital readmissions (−0.021, 95% CI = −0.037 to −0.0049, P = 0.012), per 100 patients per month. These effect sizes represent 888 avoided unplanned hospital admissions and 168 readmissions for a population of 67 402 patients per annum. Utilising NHS reference costs, the estimated savings from the reductions in unplanned care are ∼£1.7 million.ConclusionVertical integration was associated with a reduction in the rate of unplanned hospital admissions and readmissions in this study. Further work is required to understand the mechanisms involved in this complex intervention, to assess the generalisability of these findings, and to determine the impact on patient satisfaction, health outcomes, and GP workload.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference29 articles.
1. The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence
2. Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review;Kozlowska;Future Healthc J,2018
3. National Collaboration for Integrated Care and Support Integrated care and support: our shared commitment 2013 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/198748/DEFINITIVE_FINAL_VERSION_Integrated_Care_and_Support_-_Our_Shared_Commitment_2013-05-13.pdf (accessed 23 Jun 2020).
4. Ham C Murray R Implementing the NHS five year forward view: aligning policies with the plan 2015 London King’s Fund https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/implementing-the-nhs-fiveyear-forward-view-kingsfund-feb15.pdf (accessed 23 Jun 2020).
5. NHS Integrated primary and acute care systems (PACS) — describing the care model and the business model 2016 https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/pacs-framework.pdf (accessed 23 Jun 2020).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献