Diagnosing colorectal cancer in primary care: cohort study in Sweden of qualitative faecal immunochemical tests, haemoglobin levels, and platelet counts

Author:

Högberg Cecilia,Gunnarsson Ulf,Jansson Stefan,Thulesius Hans,Cronberg Olof,Lilja Mikael

Abstract

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostics are challenging in primary care and reliable diagnostic aids are desired. Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have been used for suspected CRC in Sweden since the mid-2000s, but evidence regarding their effectiveness is scarce. Anaemia and thrombocytosis are both associated with CRC.AimTo evaluate the usefulness of qualitative FITs requested for symptomatic patients in primary care, alone and combined with findings of anaemia and thrombocytosis, in the diagnosis of CRC.Design and settingA population-based cohort study using electronic health records and data from the Swedish Cancer Register, covering five Swedish regions.MethodPatients aged ≥18 years in the five regions who had provided FITs requested by primary care practitioners from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were identified. FIT and blood-count data were registered and all CRC diagnoses made within 2 years were retrieved. Diagnostic measurements were calculated.ResultsIn total, 15 789 patients provided FITs (four different brands); of these patients, 304 were later diagnosed with CRC. Haemoglobin levels were available for 13 863 patients, and platelet counts for 10 973 patients. Calculated for the different FIT brands only, the sensitivities for CRC were 81.6%–100%; specificities 65.7%–79.5%; positive predictive values 4.7%–8.1%; and negative predictive values 99.5%–100%. Calculated for the finding of either a positive FIT or anaemia, the sensitivities increased to 88.9–100%. Adding thrombocytosis did not further increase the diagnostic performance.ConclusionQualitative FITs requested in primary care seem to be useful as rule-in tests for referral when CRC is suspected. A negative FIT and no anaemia indicate a low risk of CRC.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference34 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2020) Suspected cancer: recognition and referral NG12 (NICE, London) http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12 (accessed 14 Oct 2020).

2. Regionala Cancercentrum I Samverkan [Standardised care pathway for colorectal cancer]. [Article in Swedish]. https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/diagnoser/tjock-och-andtarmscancer/vardforlopp (accessed 20 Oct 2020).

3. Sundhetsstyrelsen (2016) [The cancer patient pathway for colorectal cancer]. [Article in Danish]. https://www.sst.dk/da/Udgivelser/2016/Pakkeforloeb-for-kraeft-i-tyk--og-endetarm (accessed 20 Oct 2020).

4. Helsedirektoratet (2017) [The cancer patient pathway for colorectal cancer]. [Article in Norwegian]. https://helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/pakkeforlop-for-tykk-og-endetarmskreft/seksjon?Tittel=inngang-til-pakkeforlop-for-1368#risikogrupper (accessed 20 Oct 2020).

5. The risk of colorectal cancer with symptoms at different ages and between the sexes: a case-control study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3