Author:
MacBride-Stewart Sean,Marwick Charis,Houston Neil,Watt Iain,Patton Andrea,Guthrie Bruce
Abstract
BackgroundIt is uncertain whether improvements in primary care high-risk prescribing seen in research trials can be realised in the real-world setting.AimTo evaluate the impact of a 1-year system-wide phase IV prescribing safety improvement initiative, which included education, feedback, support to identify patients to review, and small financial incentives.Design and settingAn interrupted time series analysis of targeted high-risk prescribing in all 56 general practices in NHS Forth Valley, Scotland, was performed. In 2013–2014, this focused on high-risk non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in older people and NSAIDs with oral anticoagulants; in 2014–2015, it focused on antipsychotics in older people.MethodThe primary analysis used segmented regression analysis to estimate impact at the end of the intervention, and 12 months later. The secondary analysis used difference-in-difference methods to compare Forth Valley changes with those in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC).ResultsIn the primary analysis, downward trends for all three NSAID measures that were existent before the intervention statistically significantly steepened following implementation of the intervention. At the end of the intervention period, 1221 fewer patients than expected were prescribed a high-risk NSAID. In contrast, antipsychotic prescribing in older people increased slowly over time, with no intervention-associated change. In the secondary analysis, reductions at the end of the intervention period in all three NSAID measures were statistically significantly greater in NHS Forth Valley than in NHS GGC, but only significantly greater for two of these measures 12 months after the intervention finished.ConclusionThere were substantial and sustained reductions in the high-risk prescribing of NSAIDs, although with some waning of effect 12 months after the intervention ceased. The same intervention had no effect on antipsychotic prescribing in older people.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference25 articles.
1. High risk prescribing in primary care patients particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events: cross sectional population database analysis in Scottish general practice
2. Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: cross sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
3. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients
4. Scottish Government. NHS Circular: PCA(M)(2012)08. Health and Social Care Integration Directorate. Primary Care Division. Scottish quality prescribing Initiative, http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/pca/PCA2012(M)08.pdf (accessed 16 Mar 2017).
5. Scottish Government, British Medical Association. Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Guidance for NHS Boards and GP Practices 2014/15. http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/publications/DC20140502QOFguidance.pdf (accessed 16 Mar 2017).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献