Author:
Forbes Lindsay JL,Marchand Catherine,Doran Tim,Peckham Stephen
Abstract
BackgroundImproving care for people with long-term conditions is central to NHS policy. It has been suggested that the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), a primary care pay-for-performance scheme that rewards practices for delivering effective interventions in long-term conditions, does not encourage high-quality care for this group of patients.AimTo examine the evidence that the QOF has improved quality of care for patients with long-term conditions.Design and settingThis was a systematic review of research on the effectiveness of the QOF in the UK.MethodThe authors searched electronic databases for peer-reviewed empirical quantitative research studying the effect of the QOF on a broad range of processes and outcomes of care, including coordination and integration of care, holistic and personalised care, self-care, patient experience, physiological and biochemical outcomes, health service utilisation, and mortality. Because the studies were heterogeneous, a narrative synthesis was carried out.ResultsThe authors identified three systematic reviews and five primary research studies that met the inclusion criteria. The QOF was associated with a modest slowing of both the increase in emergency admissions and the increase in consultations in severe mental illness (SMI), and modest improvements in diabetes care. The nature of the evidence means that the authors cannot be sure that any of these associations is causal. No clear effect on mortality was found. The authors found no evidence that the QOF influences integration or coordination of care, holistic care, self-care, or patient experience.ConclusionThe NHS should consider more broadly what constitutes high-quality primary care for people with long-term conditions, and consider other ways of motivating primary care to deliver it.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference57 articles.
1. NICE and the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) 2009–2011;Sutcliffe;Qual Prim Care,2012
2. Health and Social Care Information Centre (2015) NHS payments to general practice, England, 2014–15 (HSCIC), http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB18468 (accessed 11 Sep 2017).
3. Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have we learnt?:
4. Developing quality and outcomes framework (QOF) indicators and the concept of ‘QOFability’;Lester;Qual Prim Care,2010
5. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework
Cited by
129 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献