Author:
Newbould Jennifer,Exley Josephine,Ball Sarah,Corbett Jennie,Pitchforth Emma,Roland Martin
Abstract
BackgroundTo better manage patient demand, some general practices have implemented a ‘telephone first’ approach in which all patients seeking a face-to-face appointment first have to speak to a GP on the telephone. Previous studies have suggested that there is considerable scope for this new approach, but there remain significant concerns.AimTo understand the views of GPs and practice staff of the telephone first approach, and to identify enablers and barriers to successful adoption of the approach.Design and settingA qualitative study of the telephone first approach in 12 general practices that have adopted it, and two general practices that have tried the approach but reverted to their previous system.MethodA total of 53 qualitative interviews with GPs and practice staff were conducted. Transcriptions of the interviews were systematically analysed.ResultsStaff in the majority of practices reported that the approach was an improvement on their previous system, but all practices experienced challenges; for example, where practices did not have the capacity to meet the increase in demand for telephone consultations. Staff were also aware that the new system suited some patients better than others. Adoption of the telephone first approach could be very stressful, with a negative impact on morale, especially reported in interviews with the two practices that had tried but stopped the approach. Interviewees identified enablers and barriers to the successful adoption of a telephone first approach in primary care. Enablers to successful adoption were: understanding demand, practice staff as pivotal, making modifications to the approach, and educating patients.ConclusionPractices considering adopting or clinical commissioning groups considering funding a telephone first approach should consider carefully a practice’s capacity and capability before launching.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference11 articles.
1. Primary Care Workforce Commission (2015) The future of primary care: creating teams for tomorrow, https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/The%20Future%20of%20Primary%20Care%20report.pdf (accessed 22 Mar 2019).
2. Hobbs FDR Bankhead C Mukhtar T (2016) Lancet, Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00620-6.
3. NHS England (2013) High quality care for all, now and for future generations: transforming urgent and emergency care services in England, https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/urg-emerg-care-ev-bse.pdf (accessed 22 Mar 2019).
4. Newbould J Abel G Ball S (2017) BMJ, Evaluation of telephone first approach to demand management in English general practice: observational study. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4197.
5. Boyatzis R (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献